I HATE MYSELF FOR LOVING YOU BPM HOW TO
I HATE MYSELF FOR LOVING YOU BPM SOFTWARE
I HATE MYSELF FOR LOVING YOU BPM CODE
I HATE MYSELF FOR LOVING YOU BPM FREE

I HATE MYSELF FOR LOVING YOU BPM SOFTWARE

Software bloat is a term used to describe the tendency of newer computer programs to have a larger installation footprint, or have many unnecessary features that are not used by end users, or just generally use more system resources than necessary, while offering little or no benefit to its users. So I thought I’d take a look at this question, and the common answers, in an attempt to determine once and for all whether iTunes deserves to be called bloated.įirst of all, how do you define “bloated?” Wikipedia offers the following in the introduction to its article about software bloat: Few people actually explain why they feel the program is bloated, and those who do have reasons that I tend to disagree with. As an author who specializes in explaining iTunes, I hear this often, yet many of the complaints I hear don’t go further than hurling that invective at the program. There’s a collocation that’s becoming increasingly common: the proximity of the words “iTunes” and “bloated.” Google those words and you’ll get about 220,000 results. #1622: OS feature survey results, Continuity Camera webcam preview, OWC miniStack STX.

I HATE MYSELF FOR LOVING YOU BPM HOW TO

#1623: How to turn off YouTube's PiP, use AirPlay to Mac, and securely erase Mac drives.

#1624: Important OS security updates, rescuing QuickTake 150 photos, AirTag alerts while traveling.

I HATE MYSELF FOR LOVING YOU BPM FREE

#1625: Apple's 'Far Out' event, the future of FileMaker, free NMUG membership, Quick Note and tags in Notes, Plex suffers data breach.

#1626: AirTag replacement battery gotcha, Kindle Kids software flaws, iOS 12.5.6 security fix.

Or I still use “ business process” or BPM - but only if I sense it it does not have a negative connotation.

Sometimes I use the term “ state machine” as this is the basis underneath. Sometimes I use the term “ workflow” - but it is often connected too much with human tasks and task lists. I talk about “ flows” when interacting with developers which already works much better. I haven’t had the flash of inspiration yet (let me know if you have). Unfortunately microprocesses is overloaded and not really a good fit. With the learning from SOA and microservice we might need a new name though. Just do it right and it can be super cool, as we see at our customers. You can also use other languages than Java and you are not forced to violate microservice boundaries and introduce some central BPM thing. The process engine is a library! You can run it embedded in a Java microservice like in this Spring Boot example. You only need a couple of lines of readable code.

I HATE MYSELF FOR LOVING YOU BPM CODE

This is all you need to startup a process engine, deploy a process definition and start a new process instance using a lightweight open source engine! You get persistence for the state in a database, failure handling support, Saga pattern support with compensation, time and event handling, human task management, visibility of the flow in BPMN to discuss it with other stakeholders (yes, also if you define the process by code as shown above), operating tools and more. But it is a lie -it never works out apart from simplistic cases delivering zero or low business value. It is often sold because it sounds good for the business - no dependency on IT. This is the zero-code lie (see the 7 sins of workflow). BPM tooling was dominated for a long time by big vendors going for a zero- or low-code approach which is basically about building process applications without involving any developers so business folks can do that themselves. The SOA-driven world originally envisioned by large vendors, one in which services were built out upon a byzantine framework of complex (and frequently political) “standards” never came to pass for the simple reason that developers wanted no part of it.īut the most important takeaway from SOA was arguably that developers would play a decisive - and in many cases, deciding - role on what would get used and what would not. I quickly scanned through the linked blog post and couldn’t agree more (even if I think there are more differences like built-for-reuse vs.

I hate myself for loving you bpm